SKU: 46438433269

RETEVIS RHD-771 136-174 + 400-480MHz Antena de banda dual masculina SMA-M para RT1 / RT2 / RT3 TYT MD-380 / UV8000D

Sale price$7645.50 Regular price$8495.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $2123.75 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jun 18 - Jun 23

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

RETEVIS RHD-771 136-174 + 400-480MHz Antena de banda dual masculina SMA-M para RT1 / RT2 / RT3 TYT MD-380 / UV8000D1. Le permitir obtener un rango ms largo en radios porttiles. 2. La antena tiene un poder de 2. 15dbi, y la potencia es de 20 vatios. 3. Tipo de antena: Antena suave SMA M 4. Frecuencia: 144 430MHz (136 174 + 400 470) MHz 5. Ganancia: 2. 15dB 6. Relacin de onda de pie (VSWR): Menos de 1. 5 hacia abajo 7. Impedancia: 50ohm 8. Tipo de conector: SMA M (Macho) 9. Material: ABS y TUBO CONTRATANTE DE CALOR 10. Longitud 37. 5 cm, peso 36 gramos 11. Adecuado

RETEVIS RHD-771 136-174 + 400-480MHz Antena de banda dual masculina SMA-M para RT1 / RT2 / RT3 TYT MD-380 / UV8000D
RETEVIS RHD-771 136-174 + 400-480MHz Antena de banda dual masculina SMA-M para RT1 / RT2 / RT3 TYT MD-380 / UV8000D
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 46438433269

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 1207 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
L
Verified Purchase
Linda G. Hill
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 5
Glowing Skin
Scent: Lavender, Size: 12 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
Great toner,leaves my skin glowing,removes residual dirt,moisturizing.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 30, 2026
P
Verified Purchase
Pan
Fort Morgan, US
★★★★★ 5
Good gentle foaming cleanser, not stripping at all
Size Name: 8 Fl Oz (Pack of 1), Style Name: Facial Cleanser
I use this to wash my face at night. It’s a really gentle foaming cleanser, doesn’t irritate my sensitive rosacea prone skin at all. Affordable and fragrance free. Highly recommended.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in Singapore on 24 October 2021
A
Verified Purchase
Animemous
Belleville, US
★★★★★ 5
Good and affordable
Size Name: 8 Fl Oz (Pack of 1), Style Name: Facial Cleanser
Suitable for sensitive skin. And very affordable!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in Singapore on 26 October 2022
E
Verified Purchase
Esther
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 1
Lacking authenticity
Size Name: 8 Fl Oz (Pack of 1), Style Name: Facial Cleanser
The product came without: a) a box b) product seal around the opening - so anyone can tamper with it c) no manufacturing date d) no expiry date Facial wash? Or detergent? It's anyone's guess.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in Singapore on 25 February 2022
S
Verified Purchase
Stephanie
Carnegie, US
★★★★★ 5
The pads have changed but still a good product
I have been using these make up remover pads for many years now and will continue to use them. I like the 3 pack so that I do not run out. I usually only use 1 pad a day so a 3pk will last me for a long while. I do not have any issues with the pads drying out in the time frame from opening them to using the last one so that is a major plus. I have no issues with these on my skin or that close to my eyes and they do a great job of removing my mascara, which is the only make up I use. I recommend them. I will say that in 2025 they have changed the material for their pads, they are now thinner and do not have the texture they used to have which for me the only difference is that they can be a bit more difficult to separate but nothing to complain about.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 7, 2025

recommand products