Best in 7 days
Pay in installments of $49.38 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jun 12 - Jun 17
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Eibach Front and Rear Coil Spring Lowering Kit (Set of 4) for 2000 BMW 328CiThe Eibach PRO KIT for the 2000 BMW 328Ci is a premium line of lowering springs designed to enhance the performance and appearance of your vehicle. Whether you're a car enthusiast looking to improve the handling of your daily driver or motorsports competitor looking for an edge on the track the Eibach PRO KIT has you covered. Standard Features High Performance Handling and Aggressive Good Looks. Lower Center of Gravity. Stop Quicker, Corner Faster
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
Discover Niche Categories That Outsell
Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order
Best in 7 days
Best in 7 days
Best in 7 days
Best in 7 days
4.9 ★★★★★
Based on 1496 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
Good buy
Style: Full Synthetic High Mileage, Size: 5 qt (Pack of 1), Configuration: 5W-20
Run of the mill oil but for a great price
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 27, 2026
★★★★★ 5
The Excellence of Motion Preserved
Style: Full Synthetic High Mileage, Size: 1 qt (Pack of 1), Configuration: 5W-30
In the pursuit of the ideal, where reason governs and the forms of all things aspire to perfection, the Valvoline Full Synthetic High Mileage with MaxLife Technology 5W-30 Motor Oil presents itself as a manifestation of virtue within the mechanical realm. It is not merely oil, but a substance designed with foresight, sustaining the engine as the soul sustains the body. The viscosity is measured, neither excessive nor deficient, allowing parts to move in harmonious accord, reducing friction and preserving integrity.
One observes that engines treated with this oil respond with steadiness and endurance, as if guided by a rational principle, minimizing wear and extending life in a manner that reflects the pursuit of the Good. I grant it five stars, for it exemplifies a balance between strength and refinement, a practical embodiment of foresight, wisdom, and care—ensuring that motion, that vital energy, continues undisturbed, much as a well-ordered soul achieves its fullest expression through the contemplation of virtue.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 13, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Extraordinary resource
Format: Paperback, Format: Paperback
I am a Cultural History Interpreter in SC. Working at a plantation historic site to bring suppressed history to light is challenging. Prof Sinha's book gives us easily accessible documentation to counter the "Lost Cause" devotees who appear on the site almost daily.
Her writing style is clear and lucid, a trait for which I am extremely grateful. The site is including this volume in our staff library. For those just entering the field of Public History, it is indispensable. For the rest of it is a very valuable resource. Highly recommended!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 8, 2019
★★★★★ 4
An important contribution
The historiography of secession is a complex one. For much of the last century there had been a tendency for historians to underplay the importance of slavery as a cause of the American civil war. Certaintly neo-Confederate apologists have sought to euphemize the cause of the conflict to an issue over tariffs, to matters of states rights, or to the "extremism" of the abolitionists. It is quite clear that these excuses will not survive a reading of this book. Sinha clearly shows, in her examination of South Carolina secessionism from nullifaction to fort Sumter, that slavery was the essence of its concerns. To show this she looks at the nullification crisis, the Mexican war, the Compromise of 1850, the South Carolinian movement to reopen the slave trade, and the secession crisis, based on exhaustive research of no less than 137 sets of private papers and diaries.
But Sinha wishes not simply to refute the academically unimportant group of neo-Calhounites. She wishes to argue something broader. The South Carolinian defense of slavery was not, as many serious historians suggest today, simply the working out of the Southern American view of liberty. Increasingly, Sinha argues, South Carolina pro-slavery thought was not the expression of Southern Republicanism, but increasingly its very negation. It was not a coincidence that secessionism was strongest in South Carolina, the only state by 1832 where presidential electors and the governor were not popularly elected, where the legislature was crudely malapportioned, and where local offices were limited by the state government. It was also not a coincidence that slaves were a majority of South Carolinians, and slaveholders nearly a majority of South Carolinian whites. And it certainly was not a coincidence that non-slaveholders were noticeably less enthusiastic for nullification, secession in 1851 and secession in 1861.
But although Southern nationalist discourse was clearly elitist and pro-slavery, does Sinha show that it was counter-revolutionary? A certain opposition to democracy was evident after all in the many, perhaps most, of the founding fathers. But as Sinha points out leading Carolinians like Calhoun, Senator James Chesnut and the creepy, incestuous James Hammond all sneered at the Declaration of Independence. She quotes one bravado warping PatricK Henry to declare "Give me Slavery or give me death." Notwithstanding the views of some historians to the contrary the South Carolinians criticized the North less for its oppression of wage laborers than the possiblity that those laborers could vote themselves into power. They did not condemn Lincoln as an intolerant Protestant but as a dangerous socialist and feminist. Moreover, they were not slow to raise the Nativist card against the immigrants who were bolstering the North's population. Calhoun's idea of a concurrent majority was not a thoughtful protection of minority rights, but a way to prevent one minority, his own, from ever being outvoted. Once the Confederacy was set up the elite dispensed with political parties. Looking at South Carolina they also began to dispense with competitive elections, while its ruthless elite certainly did not act sentimentally (or even decently) towards opinions on slavery.
In conclusion there have been many frauds and bullies in American political life: the Nixons, the Hoovers, the McCarthys, the Tillmans and the Bilbos. But much of their malignancy was purely personal and they never threatened the core ideals of the republic. Calhoun was different, very different. Extremely intelligent, he was also utterly principled, and absolutely ruthless in carrying out that one principle. The problem was that the principle, despite all the complications of honor and paternalism, was slavery. More so than anyone else, Calhoun was the greatest enemy of liberty and freedom the United States ever had. Sinha's book is an important contribution to understanding that.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 29, 2000
★★★★★ 5
Great information on an understudied area
Format: Paperback
Thanks for an insight to the other side. Students of Southern history -- this is a must read. Pick it up
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 1, 2013
